BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Ren L, Zhang W, Sun L, Li WW, Xiao J, Wang W, Zhao CL, Han C. Gastric cancer incidence trends in China: 1989-2018 registry data, 2022 Bayesian age-period-cohort estimates, ecological correlates. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(9): 125511 [DOI: 10.5306/wjco.125511]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
We appreciate the careful review work from the reviewers and the timely communication from the editorial office. The work of the editorial department is truly admirable. The peer review process was smooth and efficient. The reviewers' comments were highly helpful for improving the quality of our manuscript. They approach every manuscript with a rigorous attitude, conducting meticulous reviews to ensure the accuracy and authority of the content. Their teamwork is efficient, with the ability to quickly respond to various needs. Their professionalism and dedication provide a solid foundat for publishing work .The whole publication process was well organized. We are satisfied with all services provided by the journal.